The Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) went into effect July 1, 1975. It is a treaty that was signed by 179 countries to ensure that the trade of endangered plants and animals doesn’t threaten their survival as a species. In the United States, the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA) covered everything that was required by CITES, acting as our implementation. The ESA covers more species than CITES; it is currently protecting 626 foreign species. Biologists who work as part of the Division of Scientific Authority decide which species should be added or removed from the list. African Elephants, Asian Elephants, and the five extant rhinoceros species are all on this list.

Ivory carving at the United Nations – it was a gift from China
Ivory carving of an African elephant
Elephant tusks being prepared to be sold. All of the elephants these tusks came from were killed.
The Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for enforcing the ESA, CITES, and this new executive order. They have received huge budget cuts over the last few years, limiting their ability to effectively combat the illegal ivory trade. The Obama Administration has denied their request for an increased budget, and instead decided to impose rules that will increase the illegal ivory trade. Forbes contributor Doug Bandow put it very well:
The mass killing of elephants is tragic. But demand for new ivory, not items legally imported decades or centuries ago, fuels the trade. Governments should penalize poachers and their seller allies—not responsible collectors and dealers who have followed the rules.
Indeed, the administration’s new policy is worse than unfair. They are counterproductive. They will expand the illegal ivory market, divert enforcement resources, and push owners of legal ivory into the illegal trade. Which means more elephants are likely to die. Surely that is not the legacy desired by President Obama. – Doug Bandow
An elephant calf with its mother
—
We would love to hear your opinion on this issue:
Do you think this executive order will help decrease poaching?
Do you think ivory from before 1990 should be allowed to be sold?
What do you think should be done to help conservation efforts?
Tweet us @rrenaissance, Instagram @rrenaissance, or post on our Facebook Timeline at https://www.facebook.com/renaissancejewelry. You can also reach us by email at jewelery@gator.net, or call us at (352) 335-7188. Have a wonderful day.
—
References:
Fish and Wildlife Service
http://www.fws.gov/home/feature/2014/trafficking/national-strategy-wildlife-trafficking.pdf
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/laws-policies/
ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/SpeciesReport.do?lead=10&listingType=
https://www.fws.gov/international/cites/
https://www.fws.gov/international/laws-treaties-agreements/us-conservation-laws/endangered-species-act.html
Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougbandow/2014/02/17/obama-administration-treats-antique-collectors-and-dealers-as-criminals-new-ivory-rules-put-elephants-at-increased-risk/2/
National Geographic
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/02/140211-united-states-rules-wildlife-trafficking-ivory-science/
Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/new-rules-will-ban-import-and-export-of-ivory-and-make-it-harder-than-ever-to-sell/2014/02/11/de666c5a-934e-11e3-84e1-27626c5ef5fb_story.html
No comments:
Post a Comment